<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evidence Based Use of Misoprostol in Second Trimester Induction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/</link>
	<description>The Blogcast for the Academic OB/GYN Physician</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fogelson</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-3333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Fogelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-3333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off label use of drugs in pregnancy is common.  FDA approval in pregnancy is the exception, not the rule. People who have no real understanding of pharmacology and medicine love to point out that misoprotostol is not FDA approved in pregnancy, which is an utterly meaningless distinction.  Drugs are used off label throughout medicine all the time, in and out of pregnancy.

The manufacturer (Searle) has no incentive to seek FDA approval, as the drug is not expensive and does not offer great profit, and is used anyway despite lack of such an approval.    Another company has been trying to create a misoprostol insert that would pass FDA.  If it does, it will cost hundreds of dollars instead of the pennies that generic cytotec costs, without any improvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off label use of drugs in pregnancy is common.  FDA approval in pregnancy is the exception, not the rule. People who have no real understanding of pharmacology and medicine love to point out that misoprotostol is not FDA approved in pregnancy, which is an utterly meaningless distinction.  Drugs are used off label throughout medicine all the time, in and out of pregnancy.</p>
<p>The manufacturer (Searle) has no incentive to seek FDA approval, as the drug is not expensive and does not offer great profit, and is used anyway despite lack of such an approval.    Another company has been trying to create a misoprostol insert that would pass FDA.  If it does, it will cost hundreds of dollars instead of the pennies that generic cytotec costs, without any improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eal4c</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eal4c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-3332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand that you are using this for abortive purposes, but it was my understanding that this medication was not approved for use on pregnant women either by the FDA or the manufacturer. Is it problematic to use it in this context as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that you are using this for abortive purposes, but it was my understanding that this medication was not approved for use on pregnant women either by the FDA or the manufacturer. Is it problematic to use it in this context as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fogelson</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Fogelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until delivery.  

That is a really great site, thanks for pointing it out.  I&#039;m going to tweet that out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until delivery.  </p>
<p>That is a really great site, thanks for pointing it out.  I&#8217;m going to tweet that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CountryMidwife</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CountryMidwife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Based on these data, the most evidence based dose of miso for second trimester induction is 400 mcg q6h vaginally. &lt;/i&gt;

Times how many doses?  Have you seen http://misoprostol.org/File/guidelines.php ?  Good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Based on these data, the most evidence based dose of miso for second trimester induction is 400 mcg q6h vaginally. </i></p>
<p>Times how many doses?  Have you seen <a href="http://misoprostol.org/File/guidelines.php" rel="nofollow">http://misoprostol.org/File/guidelines.php</a> ?  Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fogelson</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Fogelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with you on this point.  I also am comfortable with D and Es, but unfortunately we are in the minority of docs I think.   The only docs that are good at 2nd Tri D and Es are the few that are doing abortions and some MFMs, and that&#039;s the minority of people I think.

&quot;And don’t forget this is also a preferred route if prior uterine incision.&quot;
Lets get a source on that one.   With a single uterine incision the rupture rate is about 0.4% (0 in some large series), while complication rates for D and E are above that even in skilled hands.  Rates of perforation probably go up with prior scars as well.   There&#039;s also the issue of the mother wanting to see the fetus intact.   I&#039;m comfortable going either way, as should be most people.  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you on this point.  I also am comfortable with D and Es, but unfortunately we are in the minority of docs I think.   The only docs that are good at 2nd Tri D and Es are the few that are doing abortions and some MFMs, and that&#8217;s the minority of people I think.</p>
<p>&#8220;And don’t forget this is also a preferred route if prior uterine incision.&#8221;<br />
Lets get a source on that one.   With a single uterine incision the rupture rate is about 0.4% (0 in some large series), while complication rates for D and E are above that even in skilled hands.  Rates of perforation probably go up with prior scars as well.   There&#8217;s also the issue of the mother wanting to see the fetus intact.   I&#8217;m comfortable going either way, as should be most people.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Trupin</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Trupin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would do a D and E. Safe, and likely easier for the patient. And don&#039;t forget this is also a prefered route if prior uterine incision. But agree with the discussion, in general!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would do a D and E. Safe, and likely easier for the patient. And don&#8217;t forget this is also a prefered route if prior uterine incision. But agree with the discussion, in general!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fogelson</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Fogelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Lum</title>
		<link>http://academicobgyn.com/2009/10/24/evidence-based-use-of-misoprostol-in-second-trimester-induction/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenny Lum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicobgyn.com/?p=217#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good info!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

